Exercise Science Vs Personal Training
Personal Training is not Exercise Science
What is the difference?
The difference is in the substance.
Personal Training courses are of varying standards. Some courses last for 18 months, are tafe run, and lecturers are exercise physiologists teaching a well-rounded approach to training. The lecturers touch on the components that make up safe and effective training and forewarn the soon to be personal trainers of their limitations. The entry standards are unfortunately low; the pass requirements are based on attendance.
Other courses are based over 9 weeks they are costly and teach a very basic training methodology to apply to the general population. The trainers are pumped out with the belief that they know what is required to achieve results with anyone and everyone and any other knowledge is surplus to requirements. Again the pass requirements are low but expensive.
So the result here can go one of two ways. One is the trainer gets out there into the wide world of exercise and picks up a few clients with general fitness needs and the relationship works well. The trainer is aware of limitations and happily refers clients on when they show signs of conditions beyond their scope of learning. The second is the trainer gets stuck into training a few clients, gleefully applying the newly learnt knowledge to all in range. Before long some serious difficulties occur, not initially but some time down the track due to the mismatch between what the trainer knows and what the client needs. The trainer becomes disheartened wondering why people aren’t moving forward as expected and why long-term injuries seem to be appearing.
Why is this?
Well its simple, training is a simple discipline. People however are complex. People have a plethora of needs when it comes to training. Rarely in my 10 years of training people have I found people that need ‘general training’ of any sort. Most people have risks, concerns, constraints, conditions or tough objectives. Unfortunately I don’t believe the training courses that personal trainers go through are adequate to deal with all of these issues. Maybe it’s 50:50. 50% of people, the ones in gyms etc don’t need specialist advice, they just need direction on how to get moving; great see a personal trainer. But the other 50 %, which I would say is a conservative estimate, needs more, and what’s more if they don’t receive the attention they require the results could be negative.
With the aging population and the baby boomer generation looking for ways to improve their health in a society that is not designed for health unlike the times they grew up in, this specialist advice is becoming more and more important. This specialist advice goes under the name of Exercise Science.
Exercise Science is an allied health discipline. It is a degree at most universities that consists of biomechanics, biochemistry, exercise physiology, human movements, behavioural analysis, exercise and nutrition, social and political implications of exercise to name a few. The degree programs usually cover 4 years and involve practical work in hospitals and clinics.
The application of this is seen in professional sports, elite performance and clinical settings for rehabilitation. Exercise Science and Exercise Physiologists are relatively new to the world, but the timing could not have been better. With the population suffering from the complications of inactivity, injury and illness Exercise Physiologists hold the in depth knowledge of the complexities of the human being to help overcome some if the most challenging of cases. Exercise Physiologists understand the health system and fit snugly in with physiotherapists, dieticians and psychologists assisting general practice and the population with exercise related health concerns.
So what’ the difference between Personal Training and Exercise Science? Well, its the substance.
More on what makes up Exercise Science to follow in the next Article.
posted in Exercise Science | 0 Comments
